INHABIT Artist-in-Residence 2027 at the Max Planck Institute for Empirical Aesthetics: A €10,000 Four-Month Funded Residency in Frankfurt, Closing 1 September 2026
The Max Planck Institute for Empirical Aesthetics is recruiting two artists for four-month INHABIT residencies in Frankfurt during 2027, each receiving a €10,000 fellowship paid in four instalments, a project-dependent production budget, travel and a Germany-wide transport pass, and working access to the institute’s ArtLab, sound studio and research groups; applications close 1 September 2026 at 23:59 CET.
INHABIT Artist-in-Residence 2027 at the Max Planck Institute for Empirical Aesthetics: A €10,000 Four-Month Funded Residency in Frankfurt, Closing 1 September 2026
Most artist residencies put you in a studio and leave you alone. INHABIT does something less common and more demanding: it puts you inside a working scientific research institute — one whose entire research programme is the empirical study of aesthetic experience — and expects you to actually talk to the people there.
The Max Planck Institute for Empirical Aesthetics (MPIEA) in Frankfurt am Main has opened its Open Call for Entries 2027, recruiting artists for two four-month residencies. The deadline is 1 September 2026 at 23:59 CET, the jury decides in November 2026, and the two residency windows are April–July 2027 (INHABIT #16) and September–December 2027 (INHABIT #17).
This is a small, selective programme with a long track record — the numbering tells you it has run sixteen previous editions — and the money is modest by fellowship standards but genuinely usable, because the expensive parts of a four-month stay abroad are separately covered.
Key Details at a Glance
| Item | Detail |
|---|---|
| Programme | INHABIT – Artist-in-Residence, Max Planck Institute for Empirical Aesthetics |
| Call | Open Call for Entries 2027 |
| Application deadline | 1 September 2026, 23:59 CET |
| Jury decision | November 2026 |
| Residency slots | INHABIT #16: April–July 2027; INHABIT #17: September–December 2027 |
| Duration | Four months |
| Fellowship | €10,000 total, paid in four instalments of €2,500 |
| Breakdown on the call page | €8,000 artist’s fee + €2,000 accommodation fee |
| Production budget | Project-dependent; not a fixed published figure |
| Travel | Costs to and from Frankfurt am Main, plus a Germany-wide public transport pass |
| Accommodation | Goethe University guest apartments in central Frankfurt; rent paid by the artist out of the fellowship |
| Disciplines | Performing arts and music (the FAQ also names sound and film) |
| Location | Grüneburgweg 14, 60322 Frankfurt am Main, Germany |
| Contact | [email protected]; Eike Walkenhorst, Curator Artist-in-Residence, +49 69 8300479-689 |
| Official page | aesthetics.mpg.de INHABIT |
What the Institute Actually Is, and Why That Shapes the Call
Understanding the host is not optional background reading here — it is the difference between a proposal that lands and one that reads as generic.
The MPIEA is a Max Planck Society institute devoted to empirical aesthetics: the study, with scientific methods, of how people perceive, process and are moved by art and beauty. Its current research units include the Department of Music, the Department of Cognitive Neuropsychology, the research group on Neurocognition of Music and Language, the Minerva Research Group Neural Codes of Intelligence, a group working on Structural and Physiological Imaging with High-Field MRI, and a group on the Cultural Evolution of the Arts. Former departments included Language and Literature and Neuroscience, with groups on neural and environmental rhythms, computational auditory perception, and histories of music, mind and body.
Read that list again as an artist. The centre of gravity is sound, music, language, rhythm, perception and the brain. That is why the open call names performing arts and music specifically. An artist working in, say, ceramics would struggle to find a research counterpart; an artist working with voice, listening, timing, movement or perception has half a dozen possible interlocutors.
The institute frames this in its own words as treating artistic thinking and knowledge as “reflective practices in their own right” — not as decoration for the science, and not as a public-engagement exercise. The stated aim is a mutually productive space where both sides get something.
What the Fellowship Pays, and What the €10,000 Has to Cover
Two official pages describe the money slightly differently, and it is worth reconciling them before you budget.
The open call lists an artist’s fee of €8,000 and an accommodation fee of €2,000. The programme FAQ describes the same package as a total fellowship of €10,000 for the duration of the residency, disbursed in four instalments of €2,500 each. These are the same figure viewed two ways: €8,000 + €2,000 = €10,000, paid monthly across the four months.
The practical detail that matters most is in the FAQ: artists are accommodated in Goethe University Frankfurt’s guest apartments in central Frankfurt, but rent must be covered by the fellowship recipient out of the total fellowship sum. So the €2,000 accommodation component is an allowance against your rent, not a separate reimbursement on top. If Frankfurt guest-apartment rent exceeds €500 a month, the difference comes out of your €8,000.
Separately funded, and therefore not eroding your fee:
- Travel costs to and from Frankfurt am Main
- A Germany-wide public transport pass for the residency
- A production budget, sized to the project rather than fixed at a published number
- Realisation of the final project — the public presentation is produced, not left to you
- Curatorial support throughout the residency
That last cluster is the real value. A €10,000 stipend on its own would be unremarkable for four months in a high-cost German city. A €10,000 stipend plus production money, plus a curator, plus a produced public presentation in cooperation with a Frankfurt cultural institution, is a different proposition.
What You Get Access To
The institute grants residents access to its full working infrastructure: the ArtLab (the institute’s own performance and experimentation space), a sound studio, various laboratories, extensive video and audio equipment, hardware and software, and the library.
The high-field MRI group is listed among the institute’s research units, which tells you the building contains serious imaging capacity. Nothing on the official pages promises scanner time to artists, so do not build a proposal that depends on it — but it does indicate the kind of collaboration that becomes conceivable if a research group is genuinely interested in your question.
Who INHABIT Is Looking For
The open call states three things it wants:
- Artists from the performing arts and music interested in interdisciplinary collaboration between the artistic and scientific fields.
- Artists open to developing and sharing a project publicly — as an exhibition, performance, concert or other format.
- Artists active in contemporary culture who respond to the institute with innovative and challenging ideas.
The FAQ is more pointed, and worth quoting in substance. It describes the programme as aimed at outstanding internationally active artists in the fields of performing arts, music, sound and film, and says it is “particularly interested in established artists who have developed a distinctive voice and profile.” It also wants artists who engage intellectually with historical and current discourses and approach them with a critical perspective.
Two readings follow. First, the discipline list in the FAQ is broader than the open call’s — sound and film are named there but not in the call’s summary. If you work in sound or moving image, you are plainly within scope. Second, this is not an emerging-artist programme. The word “established” is doing real work. Recent residents bear that out: INHABIT #14 went to Baff Akoto, winner of the Aesthetica Art Prize and the inaugural BFI x CHANEL Filmmaker Award; INHABIT #13 went to Kaj Duncan David, working across music theatre, audiovisual installation and electronic live performance.
If your portfolio is thin, this is a call to note for a future cycle rather than one to spend a weekend on now.
What You Have to Submit
The open call specifies four documents:
- Your CV
- An artist’s statement describing your practice, concepts and methods — maximum 500 words
- A description of the proposed project that outlines potential connections with the work of the institute and the scientific interest — maximum 500 words
- A portfolio of your work — maximum 20 pages
The FAQ describes the submission route slightly differently, naming a motivation letter, CV and portfolio uploaded through the MPIEA career portal, alongside your personal information. Where the two differ, follow the open call’s document list, which is specific to the 2027 entry — and if in doubt, write to the programme rather than guessing.
One rule is unambiguous and stated plainly: email submissions are no longer accepted. Everything goes through the upload portal. Questions, but not applications, can go to [email protected].
How to Write the 500 Words That Decide It
The project description is the deciding document, and its brief is unusually explicit: outline potential connections with the work of the institute and the scientific interest. That phrase is the assessment criterion.
A weak submission describes a beautiful project and then adds a paragraph asserting that it “resonates with questions of perception.” A strong one names a research unit, engages with what that unit actually studies, and poses a question that neither party could answer alone.
Concretely, before you write:
- Spend an evening on the institute’s department and research-group pages. Find the two or three groups whose questions genuinely touch yours.
- Read a few of their recent publications — abstracts are enough. You need to be able to describe their work in your own words without flattering it or misrepresenting it.
- Formulate your project as a question, not a deliverable. Juries composed of researchers respond to questions.
- Say what the scientists would get. The programme’s premise is mutual productivity. An artist who arrives purely to extract material from the institute is a worse fit than one who brings a problem the researchers find interesting.
- Name the format you expect the public presentation to take. Concert, performance, installation, screening — the institute has to produce it, so plausibility matters.
Keep the artist’s statement and project description as separate arguments. The statement establishes that you are a serious practitioner; the project description establishes that Frankfurt, this institute, and these four months are the right place for the next piece of work. Applicants who collapse the two waste half their word budget.
Timeline: From the Deadline to a Frankfurt Premiere
- By 1 September 2026, 23:59 CET — application uploaded in full. The institute’s stated application window runs across the summer, roughly June to September.
- November 2026 — jury decision. Selection is made by committees combining researchers from the institute’s departments with external experts in visual arts, music and performing arts. The jury composition changes with each edition, which means you cannot reverse-engineer last year’s panel; write for a mixed audience of scientists and arts professionals.
- April–July 2027 — INHABIT #16 residency.
- September–December 2027 — INHABIT #17 residency.
- During and after the residency — the resulting work is presented publicly with a changing Frankfurt partner institution. Past editions have involved the Museum Angewandte Kunst and the Tanzfestival Rhein-Main. Partner and format depend on the artistic practice and media of the resident.
Roughly two months separate the deadline from the decision, and five months separate the decision from the earlier start date. If you are selected for #16, you have from November to April to arrange your life around a four-month absence.
Two Inconsistencies on the Official Page
Being straight about this saves you a panicked email.
First, the “How To Apply” block on the open call page reads “no later than September 01, 2024” — a leftover from an earlier edition. The heading, the summary box and the sidebar all state 1 September 2026 for the 2027 call. Treat 2026 as the operative date.
Second, the descriptive text says INHABIT invites artists to spend three months in residence, while the 2027 call block and the FAQ both state a four-month duration and a fellowship split into four instalments. The three-month figure appears to be historical. The 2027 residency windows — April to July, September to December — are four months each.
Neither discrepancy changes anything material, but if your travel or visa planning depends on the exact duration, confirm it with the curator before you commit.
Common Mistakes
Applying as an emerging artist. The FAQ says “established” and “distinctive voice and profile.” A promising portfolio is not the same as an established one.
Treating the science as a theme rather than a collaboration. A project about neuroscience is not a project with neuroscientists. The call asks for connections with the work of the institute.
Ignoring the discipline centre of gravity. Performing arts, music, sound and film are what is named. Applicants from other media need an exceptionally strong argument for why this institute in particular.
Overrunning the word limits. Two 500-word documents and a 20-page portfolio. Limits stated this precisely are usually enforced.
Budgeting the €10,000 as free income. Rent comes out of it. Model your four months honestly before you accept.
Emailing the application. It will not be considered. Use the portal.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can I apply for both 2027 slots? The call presents #16 and #17 as one open call with two residency periods. The official pages do not describe separate application tracks, so state your availability and any preference clearly in your application, and ask the curator if your availability is restricted to one window.
Do I need to speak German? Nothing on the official pages requires German. The Max Planck Society operates in English as a research language, and the call and FAQ are published in English. Frankfurt is a comfortable city to work in without German, though it helps socially.
Is there a fixed production budget figure? No. The call says the production budget depends on the project. Propose something proportionate and be ready to justify costs rather than naming a number and hoping.
Does the institute cover health insurance or visa costs? Not stated. The institute maintains an International Office covering visas for research, registration, bank accounts, health insurance and housing, so support exists — but do not assume the fellowship pays for these. Ask before you plan.
Is this a job or a fellowship? A fellowship. The €10,000 is paid in four instalments over the residency. Tax treatment depends on your own residency status; take local advice.
What if I miss the 1 September 2026 deadline? The FAQ says the application period usually runs in summer, between June and September. The programme has run sixteen editions, so a 2028 call is a reasonable expectation — but that is inference from its history, not an official commitment.
Official Links and Contacts
- Open call and programme overview: https://www.aesthetics.mpg.de/en/research/inhabit-artist-in-residence.html
- Application page: https://www.aesthetics.mpg.de/en/research/inhabit-artist-in-residence/application.html
- Programme FAQ: https://www.aesthetics.mpg.de/en/research/inhabit-artist-in-residence/faq.html
- Questions: [email protected]
- Curator, Artist-in-Residence: Eike Walkenhorst, +49 69 8300479-689
- Institute address: Max Planck Institute for Empirical Aesthetics, Grüneburgweg 14, 60322 Frankfurt am Main, Germany
Next Steps
If you work in performing arts, music, sound or film and have a body of work behind you, the sequence from here is short. Read the department pages this week and identify the two research groups you would genuinely want to sit with. Draft the project description first — it is the harder of the two 500-word documents and it will tell you quickly whether the fit is real. Cut your portfolio to 20 pages that show range and rigour rather than volume. Then upload well before 1 September 2026, because a 23:59 CET deadline on a portal is not the moment to discover a file-size limit.
