Humanitarian Innovation Fund (HIF)
Funds organizations developing, testing, and scaling innovative solutions to improve humanitarian assistance.
When a new water purification tablet designed for disaster relief can serve 10,000 people at one-tenth the cost of traditional methods, or a drone-based medical supply delivery system reaches remote communities faster than any road vehicle, the humanitarian sector advances. The Humanitarian Innovation Fund (HIF), managed by Elrha, has been at the forefront of funding these breakthroughs since 2011.
At a Glance
| Component | Details |
|---|---|
| Funding Range | £50,000 - £350,000 (varies by grant type) |
| Grant Duration | 12-36 months depending on grant type |
| Application Cycle | Rolling intake with periodic calls |
| Eligible Applicants | NGOs, humanitarian agencies, social enterprises, research institutions |
| Geographic Focus | Global humanitarian contexts |
| Managing Organization | Elrha (Enhancing Learning and Research for Humanitarian Assistance) |
What is the Humanitarian Innovation Fund?
The HIF is one of the largest dedicated funders of humanitarian innovation globally. Since 2011, it has invested over £50 million in 250+ projects across 50 countries, supporting innovations ranging from mobile health technologies to shelter solutions to cash transfer systems.
HIF’s Mission
To improve outcomes for people affected by humanitarian crises by:
- Identifying and nurturing promising innovations
- Supporting rigorous testing and evidence generation
- Enabling scale and adoption of proven solutions
- Building innovation capacity across the humanitarian sector
What Sets HIF Apart
- Humanitarian sector focus: Deep understanding of crisis contexts
- Innovation portfolio approach: Invests across stages and risk levels
- Evidence emphasis: Strong focus on testing and learning
- Capacity building: Supports organizations to become better innovators
- Scale pathways: Active work to connect innovations with implementers
Types of Grants
HIF offers different grant types depending on your innovation stage:
Recognition Awards (£5,000 - £20,000)
Purpose: Recognize and give visibility to promising innovations already in use
Duration: One-time award
Best for: Innovations already operational that deserve wider recognition and potential scaling support
Journey to Scale Grants (Up to £350,000)
Purpose: Support proven innovations to achieve scale and adoption
Duration: 18-36 months
Best for: Innovations with strong evidence of effectiveness seeking to reach more people
Requirements:
- Clear evidence of impact from prior testing
- Identified pathway to scale
- Partners committed to adoption
- Robust monitoring plan
Innovation Grants (£50,000 - £150,000)
Purpose: Develop and test new solutions to humanitarian challenges
Duration: 12-24 months
Best for: Promising ideas needing development and rigorous testing
Funding covers:
- Solution development and prototyping
- Field testing and iteration
- Evidence generation
- Learning documentation
Challenge-Specific Calls
HIF periodically launches targeted calls addressing specific humanitarian challenges:
- Shelter innovation
- Water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH)
- Education in emergencies
- Protection and gender-based violence
- Climate adaptation in humanitarian contexts
What HIF Funds
Innovation Types
| Category | Examples |
|---|---|
| Products | Medical devices, shelter materials, water treatment technologies |
| Processes | New delivery methods, coordination systems, assessment tools |
| Services | Digital platforms, mobile health, cash transfer systems |
| Business Models | Social enterprise approaches, market-based solutions |
| Policies | New frameworks, standards, protocols for humanitarian action |
Priority Areas
While HIF is open to innovation in any humanitarian domain, recent priorities include:
Climate and Environment
- Climate-adaptive humanitarian solutions
- Environmental sustainability in humanitarian operations
- Disaster risk reduction innovations
Localization
- Innovations led by local and national organizations
- Solutions appropriate for local contexts
- Local capacity building approaches
Cash and Markets
- Innovations improving cash transfer efficiency
- Market-based humanitarian solutions
- Financial inclusion in crisis contexts
Protection
- Innovations preventing and responding to gender-based violence
- Child protection technologies
- Safe and dignified assistance approaches
Examples of Funded Innovations
Products:
- Solar-powered vaccine refrigerators for remote health posts
- Flatpack refugee shelter designs
- Low-cost prosthetics for conflict-affected populations
Digital Solutions:
- Blockchain-based beneficiary identity systems
- Satellite imagery analysis for needs assessment
- Mobile platforms connecting refugees with services
Processes:
- Community-led sanitation approaches
- Participatory feedback mechanisms
- Rapid assessment methodologies
Eligibility Requirements
Who Can Apply
| Organization Type | Eligible? | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| International NGOs | ✅ Yes | Traditional HIF applicants |
| National/Local NGOs | ✅ Yes | Priority for localization |
| UN Agencies | ✅ Yes | Often in partnership |
| Academic Institutions | ✅ Yes | Especially with implementing partners |
| Social Enterprises | ✅ Yes | Including for-profit with social mission |
| Private Companies | ⚠️ Case-by-case | Must have clear humanitarian application |
| Governments | ⚠️ Case-by-case | Typically as partners, not leads |
Project Requirements
- Humanitarian focus: Solution must address needs in crisis or conflict contexts
- Innovation: Genuinely new or significantly improved approach
- Evidence commitment: Willingness to test and document learning
- Affected population involvement: Community engagement in design and testing
- Partnership: Collaboration encouraged, especially with local actors
What Doesn’t Qualify
- Pure research without practical application
- Advocacy or awareness campaigns
- Core organizational support
- Emergency response funding
- Solutions with no humanitarian application
Application Process
Stage 1: Concept Note
Initial submission (typically 3-5 pages):
- Problem statement and needs assessment
- Innovation description and theory of change
- Target population and context
- Team and organizational capacity
- High-level budget estimate
HIF evaluates: Innovation potential, humanitarian relevance, team capability
Stage 2: Full Proposal (If Invited)
Detailed proposal including:
- Comprehensive problem analysis
- Detailed innovation description
- Methodology and work plan
- Monitoring, evaluation, and learning plan
- Risk assessment and mitigation
- Detailed budget with justifications
- Partnership agreements
HIF evaluates: Technical quality, feasibility, evidence plan, value for money
Stage 3: Due Diligence
For shortlisted proposals:
- Organizational capacity assessment
- Financial health review
- Reference checks
- Safeguarding and risk review
Stage 4: Selection
Final decisions made by HIF Investment Committee considering:
- Technical quality scores
- Portfolio balance
- Available funding
- Strategic priorities
Timeline
| Stage | Duration |
|---|---|
| Concept note review | 4-6 weeks |
| Full proposal development | 4-8 weeks (if invited) |
| Full proposal review | 6-8 weeks |
| Due diligence | 4-6 weeks |
| Contracting | 4-8 weeks |
| Total | 6-12 months |
Writing a Strong Application
What Evaluators Look For
1. Clear Humanitarian Problem
- Specific, evidence-based needs assessment
- Understanding of affected population
- Gap in current humanitarian response
2. Genuine Innovation
- What’s new about this approach?
- Why hasn’t this been done before?
- How is this better than existing solutions?
3. Strong Theory of Change
- Logical pathway from activities to impact
- Assumptions clearly stated
- Evidence supporting key assumptions
4. Robust Methodology
- Appropriate for innovation stage
- Ethical considerations addressed
- Affected community involvement
5. Credible Team
- Relevant expertise and experience
- Capacity to implement
- Track record in humanitarian contexts
6. Learning Orientation
- Clear evidence generation plan
- Willingness to adapt based on findings
- Commitment to sharing learning
Innovation Stages
Tailor your application to your innovation stage:
| Stage | Focus | Evidence Needed |
|---|---|---|
| Inception | Proving concept works | Qualitative feedback, usability data |
| Validation | Demonstrating effectiveness | Pilot results, comparison data |
| Scale | Achieving widespread adoption | Impact evidence, cost-effectiveness |
Insider Tips
Before Applying
- Study HIF portfolio: Understand what’s been funded before
- Engage early: HIF staff are accessible; reach out before applying
- Build partnerships: Collaboration with implementing organizations strengthens applications
- Consult affected communities: Their input should shape your innovation
Strengthening Your Application
- Be specific about the problem: Data and context matter
- Define your innovation clearly: Evaluators should understand exactly what you’re proposing
- Show your evidence commitment: Detail how you’ll test and learn
- Address scalability: Even early-stage innovations should consider future adoption
- Be realistic about timeline and budget: Overambitious plans raise concerns
Common Success Factors
- Partnership between innovators and humanitarian implementers
- Strong community engagement and co-design
- Clear pathway to evidence generation
- Realistic assessment of challenges and risks
- Commitment to sharing learning (including failures)
During Implementation
- Report honestly: HIF values learning from challenges
- Engage with learning activities: Participate in HIF’s community of practice
- Share early findings: Don’t wait for final reports
- Connect with other grantees: HIF’s network is valuable
Common Mistakes to Avoid
Conceptual Errors
- Solution seeking problem: Starting with technology rather than humanitarian need
- Reinventing the wheel: Not researching existing solutions adequately
- Ignoring context: Solutions that won’t work in crisis settings
- Top-down design: Not involving affected communities
Application Mistakes
- Vague problem statements: “Hunger is a big problem” isn’t specific enough
- Overstating novelty: Most innovations build on existing work—acknowledge it
- Weak evidence plans: No clear methodology for testing effectiveness
- Unrealistic budgets: Either too high or suspiciously low
Implementation Risks
- Scope creep: Trying to do too much with limited funding
- Ignoring evidence: Continuing without testing key assumptions
- Poor partnership management: Collaboration requires investment
- Underestimating context: Humanitarian settings are challenging
Frequently Asked Questions
Can for-profit companies apply?
Yes, but with conditions. Your innovation must have clear humanitarian application and you should partner with humanitarian organizations for implementation.
Do I need to be based in a crisis-affected country?
No, but you need to demonstrate understanding of humanitarian contexts and ideally partner with organizations operating in crisis settings.
What’s the success rate?
Competitive—typically 5-15% of concept notes proceed to funding, depending on the call and available funding.
Can I apply with an idea at concept stage?
Yes, for Innovation Grants. Journey to Scale requires existing evidence of effectiveness.
Are there restrictions on countries of operation?
Some, based on donor regulations. Check current HIF guidance for specific restrictions.
Do I need matching funds?
Not always required, but co-funding strengthens applications by demonstrating additional support and sustainability.
Can I apply multiple times?
Yes. Many successful applicants applied previously. Use feedback to strengthen future applications.
How important is affected community involvement?
Very. HIF strongly values co-design and meaningful participation of crisis-affected populations in innovation development.
Is HIF Right for Your Project?
Strong fit if:
- Your innovation addresses a genuine humanitarian need
- You’re committed to evidence-based development and testing
- You can work in or with partners in crisis-affected contexts
- You’re willing to share learning, including failures
- You see scale and adoption as goals beyond just pilot success
Not the right fit if:
- Your solution has no humanitarian application
- You need emergency response funding
- You’re seeking core organizational support
- You’re not willing to test and adapt based on evidence
- Your approach doesn’t involve affected communities
The Humanitarian Innovation Fund represents the humanitarian sector’s most substantial investment in developing, testing, and scaling innovations that improve outcomes for people affected by crises—offering not just funding, but connection to the global humanitarian innovation ecosystem.
