Canada SR&ED Tax Incentive Program

Federal tax credits supporting Canadian businesses that conduct scientific research and experimental development.

Program Type
Grant
Deadline
Dec 31, 2025
Locations
Canada
Source
Canada Revenue Agency
Reviewed by
Portrait of JJ Ben-Joseph JJ Ben-Joseph
Last Updated
Oct 28, 2025

Canada SR&ED Tax Incentive Program

Canada’s flagship R&D tax credit fueling innovation across industries

The Scientific Research and Experimental Development (SR&ED) Tax Incentive Program is Canada’s largest innovation support initiative, providing more than $3 billion annually to businesses of all sizes. Administered by the Canada Revenue Agency (CRA), SR&ED offers refundable and non-refundable tax credits for eligible expenditures related to experimental development, applied research, and basic research. Unlike traditional grants, SR&ED is claimed through the tax system, enabling companies to recover a portion of wages, materials, subcontractor costs, and overhead associated with systematic experimentation aimed at resolving technological uncertainties. Canadian-controlled private corporations (CCPCs) can receive refundable credits of up to 35% on the first $3 million of eligible expenditures, while other corporations typically receive a 15% non-refundable credit.

SR&ED is highly accessible: companies across sectors—software, manufacturing, cleantech, agri-food, and life sciences—use the program to finance iterative product development and process optimization. The key to success lies in maintaining detailed technical and financial documentation that proves eligible work. CRA reviewers examine whether activities sought a technological advancement, faced a technological uncertainty, and followed a systematic investigation. Effective claim strategies combine robust project tracking with compelling narratives that connect technical challenges to experimental work.

Key program facts

DetailInformation
Program IDcanada-sred-tax-incentive
AgencyCanada Revenue Agency
Incentive TypeRefundable and non-refundable tax credits
Maximum RateUp to 35% refundable credit for CCPCs; 15% non-refundable for other corporations
Eligible WorkExperimental development, applied research, basic research, support work
Claim FrequencyAnnually via corporate income tax return
Filing Deadline18 months after fiscal year-end
DocumentationTechnical narratives (Form T661 Part 2) and expenditure schedules

Timeline planning roadmap

To maximize SR&ED returns, integrate claim preparation into your R&D workflow throughout the fiscal year:

  1. Project initiation – Before starting a development project, identify potential technological uncertainties (e.g., achieving high-temperature performance, scaling machine learning accuracy). Assign a technical lead responsible for documenting hypotheses, experiments, and results.
  2. During project execution – Maintain contemporaneous documentation: lab notebooks, version control logs, test reports, failure analyses, and meeting minutes. Track hours worked by technical staff using timesheets or project management tools.
  3. Quarterly reviews – Hold SR&ED check-ins to assess project eligibility, update documentation, and categorize costs. This ensures that activities align with SR&ED criteria and reduces year-end workload.
  4. Year-end preparation (0–3 months after fiscal year end) – Compile technical narratives describing the uncertainties, hypotheses, experiments, and outcomes. Summarize iterations, prototypes, and key learnings. Gather financial data on salaries, materials, subcontractors, and overhead.
  5. Claim assembly (3–6 months after fiscal year end) – Complete CRA Form T661, Schedule T2SCH31 (for investment tax credit), and provincial schedules if applicable. Verify that documentation substantiates every claim component. Engage SR&ED consultants or accountants if additional expertise is required.
  6. Submission (within 18 months of year-end) – File the SR&ED claim with your corporate income tax return. Respond promptly to any CRA requests for supporting documentation or on-site reviews.

Determining eligible work

CRA assesses SR&ED eligibility using three core questions:

  • Was there a scientific or technological uncertainty? The project must attempt to resolve a problem where the outcome is not readily deducible by a competent professional. Document the knowledge gap.
  • Did the work aim to achieve a technological advancement? Show how the project generated new knowledge or improved capabilities, not just routine engineering.
  • Was there a systematic investigation? Provide evidence of hypothesis formulation, experimentation, analysis, and conclusions.

Eligible activities include experimental development to create new materials, devices, products, or processes; applied research to advance specific knowledge; basic research without practical application; and support work (engineering, design, data collection) directly related to SR&ED projects. Ineligible activities include market research, routine quality control, aesthetic changes, and reverse engineering without experimentation.

Crafting persuasive technical narratives

  • Structure – Use CRA’s five questions (line 242) as a framework: what scientific/technological advancements were sought, what scientific/technological uncertainties existed, what work was performed, what results were achieved, and what new knowledge resulted.
  • Be specific – Quantify performance targets (e.g., “increase battery energy density from 180 Wh/kg to 230 Wh/kg”). Describe experimental setups, algorithms, or prototypes in detail.
  • Highlight iterations – Document failed experiments, pivots, and design changes that illustrate systematic experimentation.
  • Link to uncertainties – Ensure each task ties back to the core technological uncertainty. Avoid descriptions that resemble routine coding or fabrication.
  • Show team expertise – Mention credentials of engineers, scientists, and technical staff demonstrating that work exceeded standard practice.

Financial documentation best practices

  • Timesheets – Track SR&ED hours for each employee. Use project codes to differentiate eligible work from non-eligible tasks.
  • Payroll records – Retain T4 slips, payroll registers, and proof of payment. CRA may reconcile claimed hours with payroll data.
  • Materials and contracts – Keep invoices, purchase orders, and usage logs for materials consumed or transformed during experimentation. Document subcontracts with statements outlining SR&ED-related tasks.
  • Overhead – Choose between the proxy method (simplified 55% of eligible salaries) or traditional method (actual overhead costs). Evaluate which yields higher credits.
  • Stacking awareness – Coordinate SR&ED claims with other funding (e.g., IRAP). Deduct government assistance from eligible expenditures to comply with stacking rules.

Maximizing provincial incentives

Many provinces offer additional SR&ED credits:

  • Quebec (RS&DE) – Refundable credits up to 30% for SMEs.
  • Ontario OITC/OITCL – Refundable and non-refundable credits for corporations with permanent establishments in Ontario.
  • British Columbia SR&ED – 10% refundable credit.
  • Alberta Innovation Employment Grant – Refundable credits for eligible expenditures over a base amount.

Coordinate provincial claims with federal filings, ensuring consistent documentation and cost allocation.

Tips and tricks for success

  • Implement SR&ED training – Educate engineers and project managers on eligibility criteria. Provide templates for documenting experiments and uncertainties.
  • Use collaboration agreements – Clarify IP ownership and SR&ED claim rights when partnering with universities or contractors.
  • Prepare for reviews – CRA may conduct a First-Time Claimant Advisory Service (FTCAS) visit or technical/financial review. Organize documentation and rehearse explanations of the experimental process.
  • Leverage technology – Use project management tools (Jira, Asana) or specialized SR&ED software to capture evidence in real time.
  • Engage advisors strategically – Consultants can help optimize claims but ensure they emphasize documentation best practices to reduce review risk.

Common pitfalls to avoid

  • Retrospective narratives – Writing technical descriptions long after project completion can miss critical details. Capture notes contemporaneously.
  • Overclaiming routine work – Avoid including bug fixes, UI changes, or standard manufacturing adjustments without experimentation.
  • Insufficient linkage – Claims must connect each cost to specific SR&ED activities. Generic statements about R&D budgets are insufficient.
  • Poor record-keeping – Missing timesheets, invoices, or experimental data can lead to claim reductions or denials.
  • Ignoring deadline – Failing to file within 18 months of year-end forfeits the credit permanently.

Post-claim strategies

  • Reinvest refunds – Allocate SR&ED refunds toward further R&D, hiring, or commercialization to compound growth.
  • Review internal controls – After each claim, assess documentation processes and update templates to address reviewer feedback.
  • Track outcomes – Monitor how SR&ED-funded projects advance to commercialization. Highlight success stories for investors or lenders.
  • Plan for scaling – As your company grows, implement more formal project accounting systems to handle multiple concurrent claims.

Additional resources

  • CRA SR&ED Guidance – Detailed policy documents, eligibility interpretations, and sample claim forms.
  • SR&ED seminars and webinars – Offered by CRA, industry associations, and accounting firms.
  • Provincial innovation agencies – Provide complementary funding, mentorship, and commercialization support.
  • SR&ED court decisions – Reviewing jurisprudence helps understand CRA interpretations and strengthens claim narratives.

By embedding SR&ED best practices into daily R&D operations, Canadian companies can unlock substantial tax credits, reduce development risk, and accelerate the journey from experimentation to market-ready innovations.